The Mexican Tetra, scientifically known as Astyanax mexicanus, is a fascinating freshwater fish species with a notable presence in the subtropical regions of North America. Often referred to simply as the Mexican Tetra, this fish has garnered attention from biologists, ecologists, and aquarium enthusiasts alike. This article delves into the key aspects of Astyanax mexicanus, providing a comprehensive overview of its taxonomy, identification, native habitat, distribution, and ecological significance.
Taxonomy and Identification
Originally described by De Filippi in 1853, Astyanax mexicanus was once considered a subspecies of Astyanax fasciatus. However, modern taxonomic understanding, supported by research from Mayden et al. (1992), suggests that A. mexicanus is more accurately classified as a distinct species complex. Distinguishing characteristics are well-documented in works by Sublette et al. (1990) and Page and Burr (1991), offering valuable resources for accurate identification. Miller (1952) also provided an early state key for identification, while illustrations and photographs in publications by Miller (1952), Miller and Robison (1973), Minckley (1973), Sublette et al. (1990), and Page and Burr (1991) further aid in visual recognition of the Mexican Tetra.
A close-up view of an Astyanax mexicanus, commonly known as the Mexican Tetra, showcasing its physical characteristics.
Size and Physical Characteristics
The Mexican Tetra is a moderately sized fish, typically reaching up to 12 cm in length. Its physical attributes, while not explicitly detailed in the original text beyond identification resources, are characteristic of tetras – generally possessing a streamlined body and fins suitable for freshwater environments. Further research into the referenced identification guides would provide more specific details on fin morphology, coloration, and other distinguishing physical traits.
Native Habitat and Distribution
The native range of Astyanax mexicanus is subtropical America, primarily encompassing eastern and central Mexico. Its distribution extends into the United States, specifically within the lower Rio Grande, lower Pecos, and Nueces rivers in Texas (Lee et al. 1980 et seq.; Page and Burr 1991). Historically, the Mexican Tetra was present in the Pecos River drainage and lower Rio Grande in New Mexico. However, its presence in New Mexico is now restricted to the Pecos drainage downstream of Dexter, indicating a contraction in its native range within the US (Sublette et al. 1990).
Non-Native Occurrences
While native to certain parts of North America, the Mexican Tetra has also been recorded in several states outside its natural range. These nonindigenous occurrences highlight the species’ ability to establish itself in new environments. Table 1 from the original article details states with reported non-native populations, including Arizona (AZ), California (CA), Louisiana (LA), Ohio (OH), Oklahoma (OK), and Texas (TX). Texas, notably, shows the most extensive nonindigenous occurrences across 42 Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUCs), indicating a significant established presence outside the tetra’s native range within that state.
| State | First Observed | Last Observed | Total HUCs with observations† | HUCs with observations† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ | 1950 | 1980 | 3 | Imperial Reservoir; Lower Colorado; Yuma Desert |
| CA | 1950 | 1977 | 2 | Imperial Reservoir; San Antonio |
| LA | 1954 | 1980 | 3 | Cross Bayou; Loggy Bayou; Vermilion |
| OH | 1966 | 1966 | 1 | Upper Scioto |
| OK | 1952 | 1994 | 5 | Bois D’arc-Island; Groesbeck-Sandy; Illinois; Lake Texoma; Lower Neosho |
| TX | 1908 | 2024 | 42 | Austin-Travis Lakes; Buchanan-Lyndon B. Johnson Lakes; Central Laguna Madre; Cibolo; Concho; East San Antonio Bay; Guadalupe; Lake Texoma; Lampasas; Lavaca; Little; Llano; Lower Brazos; Lower Brazos-Little Brazos; Lower Colorado-Cummins; Lower Guadalupe; Lower Neches; Lower San Antonio; Lower Sulpher; Lower Trinity; Medina; Middle Colorado-Concho; Middle Colorado-Elm; Middle Colorado-Llano; Middle Concho; Middle Guadalupe; Navasota; North Bosque; Pedernales; Sabine Lake; San Antonio; San Gabriel; San Marcos; San Saba; South Concho; South Corpus Christi Bay; Spring; Upper Colorado; Upper Guadalupe; Upper San Antonio; West Matagorda Bay; Wichita |
Table 1. States with nonindigenous occurrences of Mexican Tetra, earliest and latest observations, and HUCs with observations.
Means of Introduction
The primary pathway for the introduction of Mexican Tetra into non-native areas is attributed to bait bucket releases. This occurs when anglers, using the fish as bait, release unused portions into water bodies, leading to the establishment of populations outside their natural range. The earliest documented observation of A. mexicanus outside its native range was in a bait shop in Yuma, Arizona, in 1950. These fish were believed to be unintentional contaminants within minnow shipments (Evans and Douglas 1950; Miller 1952), highlighting an early instance of human-mediated dispersal.
Status and Ecological Impact
The Mexican Tetra is considered established in Texas outside its native range. While it was formerly found in the Rio Grande valley in New Mexico, it may now be extirpated from that region. Similarly, populations in southern Oklahoma, once established, are now considered extirpated due to a lack of recent sightings (Cashner and Matthews 1988). New Mexico classifies the species as “state endangered” due to its decline in the Pecos River drainage (Sublette et al. 1990).
The ecological impacts of non-native Mexican Tetra populations are currently not well understood. The original article emphasizes that no specific studies have been conducted to assess their effects on invaded ecosystems. However, it also points out that the absence of data does not imply a lack of impact. Concerns exist regarding the potential for Astyanax mexicanus to negatively affect native fish communities due to its predacious and aggressive nature. Miller (1952) and Minckley (1973) raised concerns about potential predation on native fish young. Further research is crucial to evaluate the ecological consequences of Mexican Tetra introductions and to inform appropriate management strategies.
Remarks and Further Research
Astyanax mexicanus holds the distinction of being the only characid species native to the United States. Its predatory and aggressive behavior raises ecological concerns, necessitating further investigation into its interactions with native fish species, particularly in areas where it has been introduced. Distribution maps provided by Lee et al. (1980 et seq.) and Page and Burr (1991) offer valuable insights into its spread, while ongoing monitoring and research are essential to understand its evolving status and impact. The provided voucher specimens (Ohio: OSM 14147; Texas: INHS 75684) serve as important references for taxonomic verification and distribution studies.
References: (click links in original article for full references)
Bechler, D. L., and R. C. Harrel. 1994. Notes on the biology and occurrence of Astyanax mexicanus (Characidae, Teleostei) in southeast Texas. Texas Journal of Science 46(3):293-294.
Cashner, R. C., and W. J. Matthew. 1988. Changes in the known Oklahoma fish fauna from 1973 to 1988. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 68:1-7.
Conner, J. V., and R. D. Suttkus. 1986. Zoogeography of freshwater fishes of the western Gulf Slope of North America. Pages 413-456 in C. H. Hocutt and E. O. Wiley, editors. The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
Dowell, V. E., and C. D. Riggs. 1958. Further observation on Astyanax fasciatus and Menidia audens in Lake Texoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 33(1955):52-53.
Evans, W. A., and P. A. Douglas. 1950. Notes on fishes recently introduced into southern California. California Fish and Game 36:435-436.
Hubbs, C., T. Lucier, G. P. Garrett, R. J. Edwards, S. M. Dean, E. Marsh, and D. Belk. 1978. Survival and abundance of introduced fishes near San Antonio, Texas. Texas Journal of Science 30(4):369-376.
Hubbs, C. L., W. I. Follett, and L. J. Dempster. 1979. List of the fishes of California. California Academy Science Occasional Papers 133. 51 pp.
Koster, W. J. 1957. Guide to the fishes of New Mexico. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM.
Lambou, V. W. 1962. Fishes occurring in Lake Bistineau, Louisiana. Proceedings of the Louisiana Academy of Sciences 25:75-79.
Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980 et seq. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, NC.
Mayden, R. L., editor. 1992. Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Miller, R. J., and H. W. Robison. 1973. The fishes of Oklahoma. Oklahoma State University Press, Stillwater, OK.
Miller, R. R. 1952. Bait fishes of the lower Colorado River, from Lake Mead, Nevada, to Yuma, Arizona, with a key for identification. California Fish and Game 38(1):7-42.
Minckley, W. L. 1973. Fishes of Arizona. Arizona Fish and Game Department. Sims Printing Company, Inc., Phoenix, AZ.
Page, L. M., and B. M. Burr. 1991. A field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of Mexico. The Peterson Field Guide Series, volume 42. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.
Riggs, C. D. 1954. The occurrence of Astyanax fasciatus mexicanus in Lake Texoma, Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science 33(1952):141.
Sublette, J. E., M. D. Hatch, and M. Sublette. 1990. The fishes of New Mexico. New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, NM. 393 pp.
Swift, C. C., T. R. Haglund, M. Ruiz, and R. N. Fisher. 1993. The status and distribution of the freshwater fishes of southern California. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 92(3):101-167.
Trautman, M. B. 1981. The fishes of Ohio. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH.
